Wednesday, November 30, 2005

North American News: Georgia details unveiled; Osipow Discovers Bears; Colorado troubles?

North American News: Georgia details unveiled; Osipow Discovers Bears; Colorado troubles?: "Colorado events in danger
The Colorado cycling community is up in arms with the news that the Colorado State Patrol has added a new policy that could disable some the biggest bicycle events in the state. The new policy limits bicycle and triathlon events to 2500 riders, but the limit can be lowered at any time, putting the state's most popular events at risk. Bicycle races, tours, charity rides, group rides and triathlons are all affected.

Bicycle Colorado, a non-profit coalition of individuals, organizations and bicycling-related businesses, has posted an online petition urging interested cyclists to voice their concerns to state officials.

'The State Patrol says that they are using this ban to ‘ensure safety,'' Bicycle Colorado's Web site states, 'but a random cap has no effect on the safety of bicyclists. Safety is based on good event planning, educated bicyclists, traffic management plans, safe roads, and law-abiding motorists. A well-run event can be safe for 10,000 bicyclists and a poorly run event can be unsafe for 100 riders. An arbitrary cap punishes everyone and discourages all events.'

Events that draw more than 2500 participants include the Iron Horse Classic, the Elephant Rock Cycling Festival, the Triple Bypass, the Mt. Evans Hill Climb, the MS 150 charity ride, the Courage Classic, the Tour de Cure and the Bicycle Tour of Colorado.

'We formally asked the State Patrol to reverse their decision and they declined,' Bicycle Colorado states on its Web site. 'In State Patrol's reply to Bicycle Colorado they said that, ‘the primary reason for this change in policy is due to safety.' But according to Scot Harris, director of the Elephant Rock ride, the state's largest bicycle event, they've had only one car-bike crash in the 19-year history of this event. States like New York, Texas, Iowa, Illinois, and California safely handle events with 10,000, 20,000 and even"

Monday, November 21, 2005

San Francisco Grand Prix canceled - Cycling - Yahoo! Sports

San Francisco Grand Prix canceled - Cycling - Yahoo! Sports: "SAN FRANCISCO (AP) -- The San Francisco Grand Prix, a cycling race that attracted the likes of Lance Armstrong, was canceled for next year because organizers could not agree with the city over pay for police and other services.

'Sadly, it's a no-win situation, and we simply cannot go forward,' said David Chauner, director of San Francisco Cycling LLC, which founded the 108-mile race. It is considered one of the country's most challenging races because of its length and the city's steep hills.

The cancellation, announced Sunday, comes as officials argue over how much of the race's cost -- if any -- should be absorbed by the city.

ADVERTISEMENT
Mayor Gavin Newsom's office has said the city would pay some expenses because the event attracts tourists. This year's Labor Day weekend race generated $10.2 million for city businesses, according to a study commissioned by the San Francisco Convention & Visitors Bureau.

The Board of Supervisors initially approved a deal in April to pay much of the cost of policing the event in exchange for 40 percent of the race's profits. But some questioned why organizers should be allowed to have the race -- originally set for Sept. 10, 2006 -- despite an outstanding bill for $89,924 from last year's event.

San Francisco Cycling and Newsom's office said the city mailed the bill only this month.

Updated on Monday, Nov 21, 2005 4:12 pm EST"

Sunday, November 20, 2005

Newsday.com: Rise in bike deaths gives edge to clash over cycling in New York

Newsday.com: Rise in bike deaths gives edge to clash over cycling in New York: "With a month left in the year, police records show 21 cyclists have died in traffic accidents in New York, up from 15 in all of 2004.

The number may just be a statistical anomaly, transportation officials said. Between 2000 and 2004, traffic accidents killed 82 cyclists in the city, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration _ an average of about 16 deaths per year.

This year's small spike has further angered a riding community already upset by what they perceive as an unfriendly view of bikers among some drivers and city officials. "


Seems like the same story we hear everywhere: The Invisible Cyclist. Sounds like a black and white sicfi movie. With the rise in gas prices and more people taking to the streets on top of their trusty two/three weelers, it's statistically probable that we're going to have more cyclist deaths. I wonder how long it'll take before we start seeing ads for sharing the road. Which begs the question, where are the cycling governing bodies? I'd like to see ads that put a face and story to cyclists....much like cancer, child/spouse abuse, smoking, etc. Let's personalize and personafy this.

Thursday, September 29, 2005

I met Lance Armstrong this morning....


So I rode to the start of the Tour of Hope this morning at Scripps Clinic's Green Hospital, were Lance Armstrong led a group of 25 caner-athletes on a 3,000+ mile ride to the White House to raise further awareness and funds for cancer research. This is a picture of Lance's bike...the 25 other riders were also equipped with yellow Trek bikes, with various mixes of components, but all featuring the logos of the Tour of Hope sponsors. This was a nice lesson on publicity and public relations gone right....

Saturday, September 24, 2005

Base miles and other training stuff

So, I'm bound by the super ninja USA coaching code of ethics to chime in regarding the base building conversation
 
If you're not interested in reading a long, funny at times, informative e-article....please hit DELETE now.
 
For the rest of ya, I'll be generalizing a lot and keep in mind that generalizations will generally not apply to you, generally speaking!  I'll also try and keep to the point and not spin out of control on any one subject.  If you have any questions about any of this, feel free to email me and I'll point you to more confusing information.
 
What the heck is base building or base miles?
The short of it, a period of lower intensity training.  Also known as endurance training or Long Slow Distance (LSD).  The duration of the period ideal for base building varies from athlete to athlete and is dependent on a number of factors including athletic/race goals, athletic maturity (i.e. cycling age versus calendar age), fitness, hours available for training, life style (including stressors and support systems), etc.  Lower intensity is also subjective; what Dave might consider low intensity might in fact be over my threshold.  It's important for you to figure out your program and not copy anyone else's.
 
What the heck is it good for?
Get your muscular/skeletal system ready for the anticipated demands of higher intensity training and eventual racing.  Also, help build physiological systems to assist with energy utilization and recovery.  This last part delves into the building blocks of energy utilization and consumption with fancy terms such as mitochondria building, ATP utilization, Lactic Acid buffering systems, beer, etc...we'll skip over this.  Just know that it's a good thing, unless you're limited by the number of hours you can train (more on this later).
 
How the heck long does it go for?
That depends on a lot of factors such as your season, current fitness, goals, shoe size, ATM pin, etc.  Generally speaking, if you're fit and free from injury and assuming you're racing sometime in the future, then a period of at least 6 to 8 weeks of base building is ideal.  This does not include the incorporation of strength training into your program, which totally counts as a form of intensity introduced very gradually and carefully over the course of your off season training.  Unless you're old like me, in which case doing some sort of strength training once per week might do you a lot of good (yes, Yoga counts).
 
==>An absolutely important variable most people forget to account for is LIFE!  It's like this Ya'll, if you've got all day to train and don't have to work a traditional job, if you don't have family/life/school obligations that put demands on your time and energy, if you can afford to put your feet up after training and recovery, and if you have a live in massage therapist/Sushi chef named Yoshi, then you might consider doing long slow distance base miles for a number of weeks.
 
But, if you just happen to live in the real world with life obligations, someone who has limited time to train, then just doing base miles might not be the right path for you.  My rule of thumb is that if you have less than 8 total hours per week to train, then consider mixing base miles with some intensity.
 
How the heck do I know how much base building I should do?
Sorry kids, there is no clear cut answer.  It really depends; how many total hours do you have to train on a weekly basis?  Do you race or are ya in it just for fun/fitness/socialization?  If you race, what's your racing schedule for the next season?  Have you picked out your A/B/C races?  Whose legs do you think are bigger; mine or Erik The Jackal's?
 
As a rule of thumb, try doing just base miles for 4-6 weeks, then gradually introduce some intensity into the mix.  Start out by figuring out how many realistic hours you have during the week to train, then see if you can do 90% of your total weekly training time in your base zone and introduce 10% of your weekly time with a bit of intensity, do this for two weeks then increase the intensity to 15-20% of your total time, another couple of weeks and go up to 20-25% of intensity for your total time, and so forth until you're at a 50/50 ratio about 3-4 weeks prior to a major event/race.  Then begin a gradual decrease of intensity for tapering.
 
How the heck do I know what my base and/or intensity level is?
Ahhhh, you're astute!  We're now talking about an objective measure of your fitness and in my not so humble opinion, the most objective way to measure your current fitness is via an LT/VO2mx test.  For example, we recently scheduled a series of tests for Swami's (my team in San Diego) and about 25 people took advantage of the testing through the Fit Stop Human Performance Lab.  Ideally, I would like to have my athletes tested quarterly to gauge improvement in fitness and to ensure their training utilizes their latest numbers.  These tests give us an objective snapshot of your fitness by eliminating any guess work.  From the results of the test, heart rate training zones are outlined for you to follow.  It just couldn't get any better or easier!
 
If you're not one for testing, there's literally hundreds of formulas you can use to guess your training zones and I'm sure you're all familiar with them.  The most popular one seems to be the 220 - your age = good approximation of your MaxHR...you then take 75% of this number and that's your endurance zone.  In my case 220 - 39 (as of next week!!!) = about 180, my projected MaxHR...and 75% of this is 135.  Give and take 5 points because I'm a Libra and my endurance zone is between 130-140.  Not bad!
 
Another formula I came across about 10 years ago by Phil Maffetone has been very reliable for me and here it goes:
180 - your age = base training HR
In my case 180 - 39 = about 140
Now, you can add or subtract between 5 to 10 points depending on your fitness and health history; if you've been free from sickness AND injury during the past 3 months, then add 10 points.  If you've been sick at all or injured at all during the past 3 months, subtract between 5-10 points.  This gives you an endurance range and the low level intensity zone to work with.
 
I like this formula better only because it gives you a range and is not fixated on a specific number, as is the case with the 220 formula.
 
What the heck is up with the Power thingieMAjig you keep wanting me to buy....is it necessary?
Well, a Watt meter might tell you WHAT'S going on, but it won't tell you why or how.  I truly recommend the use of at least a good heart rate monitor; one that stores data and can be downloaded later.  If you want to take it one step further, get a Power Meter and pay attention to your HR & Power profile and energy consumption in addition to all the other cycling related information (AV speed, distance, etc.)  But don't get too geeked about collecting data.  If you don't use it to your benefit, it's a waste of time, money and energy.  And, it's all rather simple once someone explains it to you.
 
Will Kam ever shut up?
Yes, I've typed enough.  Raceplan coaches, Patrick Jak, Teddy Allen, Karla Bland and I are here to help if you need it.  Don't be shy...we're coaches because we get a kick out of helping people succeed, not because we want to get rich.  Don't be afraid to ask for help!
 
Also, Raceplan has partnerships with Polar and Cycle Ops in case you're interested in ordering a HRM or Power Meter.  Our cost is yours.
 
Kam Zardouzian
Chief Instigator Raceplan Coaching & Racing
Kam@Raceplan.com
www.raceplan.com
tel:
mobile:
858-414-2624
858-414-2624
Add me to your address book... Want a signature like this?
 

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.6/111 - Release Date: 9/23/2005

Saturday, August 27, 2005

Dave Z's ITT win.

Follow this link to a video of Dave Z's prolog win as seen from CSC's follow
car with Bjarne. The video took a bit to download for me but it was worth
the wait.

http://www.cervelo.com/movieviewer.aspx?id=7

Kam

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.10.15/82 - Release Date: 8/25/2005

Tuesday, August 09, 2005

Food for thought....literally.

I saw this from Joe Friel's latest newsletter and it hit a home run with me so I'm sharing.
Around the time of the Tour de France there are often questions about how an athlete should go about losing weight in order to climb better. There’s little doubt that being lighter means climbing faster. Pro cyclists who contend for the yellow jersey, the polka dot jersey or who need to support their team leader in the Alps and Pyrenees try to be lean by the time the terrain turns upward. The best climbers are generally less than 2 pounds of body weight for every inch of height (divide your weight in pounds by your height in inches to find this number). It’s rare to find a rider in the pro peloton at 2.5 pounds per inch or greater. A lot of them who are not climbing specialists are around 2.1 to 2.2. The latest average I have for the TdF field shows an average of 2.151 pounds per inch (thanks to Gregory Byerline for providing that data).

Every pound of excess fat shaved from your body saves you about 3 watts in a climb. In running it is something like 2 seconds per mile per excess pound in a race. For most endurance athletes, a 1-point shift in weight-to-height ratio means about 5 percent loss of weight—around a 7- to 9-pound loss of love handles. That can be done safely over a two-month period if there is a big A-race with lots of climbing or the need to run faster on the calendar a couple of months from now.

How is it best for an athlete to lose weight? Unfortunately, there have been few studies of serious athletes that looked at this question.

One group of researchers, however, has examined the issue in an interesting way. They compared eating less to exercising more to see which was more effective in dropping excess body fat.

They had six endurance-trained men create a 1,000-calorie-per-day deficit for seven days by either exercising more while maintaining their caloric intake, or by eating less while keeping exercise the same. With 1,000 calories of increased exercise daily—comparable to running an additional 8 miles or so each day—the men averaged 1.67 pounds of weight loss in a week. The subjects eating 1,000 fewer calories each day lost 4.75 pounds on average for the week.

So, according to this study, the old adage that “a calorie is a calorie” doesn’t hold true. At least in the short term, restricting food intake appears to have a greater return on the scales than does increasing training workload.

Notice that I said “on the scales.” The reduced-food-intake group in this study unfortunately lost a greater percentage of muscle mass than did the increased-exercise group. That is an ineffective way to lose weight. If the scales show you’re lighter, but you have less muscle to create power, the trade-off is not a good one.

How can you reduce calories yet maintain muscle mass? Unfortunately, that question hasn’t been answered for athletes, but it has been for sedentary women. Perhaps the conclusions are still applicable to athletes.

In 1994, Italian researchers had 25 women eat only 800 calories a day for 21 days. Ten ate a relatively high-protein and low-carbohydrate diet. Fifteen ate a low-protein and high-carbohydrate diet. Both were restricted to 20 percent of calories from fat. The two groups lost similar amounts of weight, but there was a significantly greater loss of muscle on the high-carbohydrate, low-protein diet. It appears that when calories are reduced to lose weight, which is more effective than increasing training workload, the protein content of the diet must be kept at near normal levels. This, of course, assumes that you’re eating adequate protein before starting the diet, which many athletes aren’t. When training hard, a quality source of protein should be included in every meal, especially when trying to lose weight.

Joe Friel is president and founder of Ultrafit Associates and the author of the Training Bible book series. For more information on training, racing and coaching go to www.Ultrafit.com
Kam Zardouzian

Chief Instigator Raceplan Coaching & Racing
Kam@Raceplan.com
www.raceplan.com
tel:
mobile:
858-414-2624
858-414-2624

Add me to your address book... Want a signature like this?

Taking time off

A question about taking time off was posed recently.

Question: I am thinking now of starting up my training in a more serious form after I get to Santa Cruz in September (or when I get back here in October). I know that I should take some time off, but I am not sure how much and when. my goal is to train for next season
Answer: Taking time off is one of the trickiest things in cycling. It needs to happen but everyone reacts differently to it. One big mistake is that people take complete time off from the bike as well as physical activity. That's a mistake in my opinion, especially if you're healthy....i.e. if an injury is not forcing you away from activity.
Taking time off is meant to let your little sores and aches heal, get your body to use different muscles, and your mind to refreshen itself. I usually take one big two week break from the bike but substitute the hours away from riding with tennis, hiking, running, yoga, surfing, etc. I also take at least two one week or partial week times off in the middle of the season but totally reduce all activity and let my body heal from things....you'll get to appreciate the need for these little breaks as you age!
No matter what you do, the biggest favor you can do for yourself is to free your mind from any angst of being away from riding when you do take time off. For example, on my recent surf trip to Sinaloa where riding a bike was just not happening, I simply made peace with that fact and enjoyed all the other activities that were available to me. Certainly 4-7 hours of surfing every day did the job nicely, but I also threw in some fast paced walking and canoeing to mix it up. It took me a day and a half to let it all go and while my body recovered from the specific demands of riding, I also let my mind refreshen itself from the demands of "being on" with training and racing.
Coming back home and resuming training was done very gradually and to say I eased into it is an understatement. I always feel a bit awkward getting back on the bike after some time but I know through experience that fitness will come back, form will comeback, strength will come back much better if your time off the bike is one that maintains your fitness while refreshes your mind.
My suggestion is to take 10-14 days from riding certainly to coincide with your trip to Peru where I'm sure you'll do some hiking. But also for when you get back. Your move to and from Chicago has a physiological and psychological cost, even if you think you can just push through. Allow yourself a few days of moderate activity to settle down from the energy you spend moving. Then get into it gradually and with ease.
Your season is a way off and you have loads of time. You don't need to be peaked anytime soon so focus on enjoying your life!

Monday, August 08, 2005

Are you happy to see lance retire?

Some food for thought on this beautiful Monday.

There is loads of hoopla in the news about Lance and his retirement.  I've been running an informal poll on my web site for the past week asking if people are happy to see him retire (www.receplan.com).  As of today, 27 votes for yes, 10 for no.

I intentionally left the language loose because I wanted to capture as many reasons as possible as to why people are happy or not to see Lance retire. Now that enough sample votes are in for me to guess what the results are, I'm starting to wonder what those reasons might really be.  For example, could people be happy to see Lance retire because they're bored watching him dominate the Tour?  do they have Lance-Lash?  Or, do they just dislike Lance?  How many of my voters are US residents versus, say, from France or Germany where love for Lance is scarce. Or, looking at it from a complete different angle, what portion of these folks is happy to see Lance retire so he can spend time with his kids, spend all his hard earned money, run for public office and sing back up for Sheryl Crow?

How about the loyal fans who are not happy to see him retire.  They obviously connect with him in some way.  How many might be cancer survivors who see Lance as a source of hope?  How many are new to cycling and have not yet built immunity to the Lance
Lone Star?  How many are kids?  How many women and how many men?

What ever the reasons might be, I know that as much as I have experienced Lance-Lash, I still get goose bumps watching some of the classic footage of him tear up the competition.  I get goose bumps knowing I ran into him at the 1988 Texas Hill Country Triathlon, where the brash 15 year old was weaving stories about his girl friend.  I still get goose bumps thinking this kid came back from near death to do what has never been done.  All of these reasons, in addition to the ones I can't currently think of, motivate me to excel in my life...in all areas of my life.

The big question for me is whether I'd still get these nostalgic feelings about the power of Lance if he had not retired.  For now, I will access my memory banks for the images, sounds and files of this amazing human being and marvel at this impact on the human race at this specific moment in time.

Long Live Lance!

Kam

Tuesday, August 02, 2005

Competitor's Radio Show Podcast meeting. Bob's ready to rumble......

Competitor podcasting meeting. Bob looks ready to digitize!

Thursday, July 28, 2005

Le Tour by the numbers

Tour '05 by the Numbers

 

1 -- days that the yellow jersey was not worn by an American (Dave Zabriskie had it for three stages, Lance Armstrong for 17 stages, Germany's Jens Voigt for one stage)

2 -- crashes in the nightmarish stage 20 time trial of Denmark's Mickael Rasmussen, which, along with one puncture and three bike changes knocked him from 3rd to 7th in the final GC (he did win a stage and King of the Mountains, though)

3 --  Americans in the general classification's final top 10, the most of any country (1. Armstrong; 6. Levi Leipheimer; 9. Floyd Landis) along with 14. George Hincapie; 17. Bobby Julich; 33. Chris Horner; 132. Fred Rodriguez; 139. Guido Trenti; DNF: Zabriskie

3 -- stage wins by Aussie sprinter Robbie McEwen, the most by any rider

4:40 -- Lance's winning margin over second-place Ivan Basso, the second smallest of his 7 Tour victories (1:01 in 2003)

7 -- finishes on the podium in 8 starts for Germany's Jan Ullrich (third this year after finishing fourth in 2004)

8 -- rookie Cadel Evans' GC finish, the best for an Australian since Phil Anderson's two fifth places in the 1980s

10 -- American victories in the Tour in the last 20 years

25 -- career stage wins for Lance, counting three team time trial victories

26.8 -- Lance's average speed in miles per hour for the Tour's 2,228 miles (41.6 kph for 3,593 km)

28.8 -- Lance's average speed in miles per hour (46.4 kph) in stage 20's 34-mile time trial, his first victory of the season

30 -- percent chance of Lance living in 1996 after he was diagnosed with testicular cancer that had spread to his abdomen, lungs and brain

30 -- Americans who have raced in the Tour de France since Jacques Boyer was the first in 1981

45 -- riders who started in the field of 189 but did not reach the finish line in Paris

83 -- yellow jerseys won by Lance, second only to Eddy Merckx's 111

500,000 -- spectators that saw this 92nd Tour finish in Paris

536,330 -- difference in euros between Discovery Channel's Tour winnings and those of Spain's Euskaltel-Euskadi, which took home 9,310

 

Tour by the numbers


Tour '05 by the Numbers

 

1 -- days that the yellow jersey was not worn by an American (Dave Zabriskie had it for three stages, Lance Armstrong for 17 stages, Germany's Jens Voigt for one stage)

2 -- crashes in the nightmarish stage 20 time trial of Denmark's Mickael Rasmussen, which, along with one puncture and three bike changes knocked him from 3rd to 7th in the final GC (he did win a stage and King of the Mountains, though)

3 --  Americans in the general classification's final top 10, the most of any country (1. Armstrong; 6. Levi Leipheimer; 9. Floyd Landis) along with 14. George Hincapie; 17. Bobby Julich; 33. Chris Horner; 132. Fred Rodriguez; 139. Guido Trenti; DNF: Zabriskie

3 -- stage wins by Aussie sprinter Robbie McEwen, the most by any rider

4:40 -- Lance's winning margin over second-place Ivan Basso, the second smallest of his 7 Tour victories (1:01 in 2003)

7 -- finishes on the podium in 8 starts for Germany's Jan Ullrich (third this year after finishing fourth in 2004)

8 -- rookie Cadel Evans' GC finish, the best for an Australian since Phil Anderson's two fifth places in the 1980s

10 -- American victories in the Tour in the last 20 years

25 -- career stage wins for Lance, counting three team time trial victories

26.8 -- Lance's average speed in miles per hour for the Tour's 2,228 miles (41.6 kph for 3,593 km)

28.8 -- Lance's average speed in miles per hour (46.4 kph) in stage 20's 34-mile time trial, his first victory of the season

30 -- percent chance of Lance living in 1996 after he was diagnosed with testicular cancer that had spread to his abdomen, lungs and brain

30 -- Americans who have raced in the Tour de France since Jacques Boyer was the first in 1981

45 -- riders who started in the field of 189 but did not reach the finish line in Paris

83 -- yellow jerseys won by Lance, second only to Eddy Merckx's 111

500,000 -- spectators that saw this 92nd Tour finish in Paris

536,330 -- difference in euros between Discovery Channel's Tour winnings and those of Spain's Euskaltel-Euskadi, which took home 9,310

Thursday, July 07, 2005

RE: New Training

Coach Kam:
 
You rock!  As a testimonial to all, I just completed Ironman Couer d'Alene and could not have completed this event without the structure of RacePlan and the personal guidance provided by my pal Kam.  He kept me on task and highly motivated, especially during those early training months when there was no light and the end of the tunnel and I 'd question [again] just why in the hell I was doing this.  I'm no seasoned tri veteran, just a guy who has run a number of marathons and wanted to take it to the ultimate test.  I didn't even own a bike when I signed up [but did win a surfboard on a bet that I wouldn't finish!].  
 
Thanks, Kam, for the significant role you played in preparing me for what turned out to be an awesome life experience.  I need to return your bike travel box and want to review my IM experience to gauge what we did right and what I would do differently should I ever decide to do another one.  Let me know when we can get together.
 
Bob Scott.        
-----Original Message-----
From: Raceplan@googlegroups.com [mailto:Raceplan@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Kam Zardouzian
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 1:27 PM
To: Blog; Raceplan Group
Subject: New Training

It's the beginning of July and my season is over!
 
That's amazing to me because when I was in Colorado I'd just be peaking around this time.  Certainly my friends in the Rocky Mountains are all starting to race more.  But not for this newly planted SoCal Boy.  I'm all done!  The TT season picks back up in September so I'm taking a bit of a breather, especially after the RAAM, and then hitting the gym and building base miles.
 
I'm looking forward to a little surf trip my buddy Chris Miller has planned.  We'll be surfing the warm water of Sinaloa July 17-24th and I am really, really ready for it!
 
After that, I've built a pretty aggressive schedule to utilize the great strength that I've been able to keep through the season.  My base building schedule will call for 6 days of riding, two days in the gym and a power Yoga class per week.  I thought about incorporating some running and swimming into the mix, but after one run I realized I wasn't into it.  If it guaranteed that I would shed 10Lbs., I'd do it.  But I know I can accomplish this through riding and gym alone.
 
My schedule will look something like this:
Monday: Gym
Tuesday: 2hr lunch ride, a bit of intensity, followed by Yoga at night
Wednesday: 4-5hrs endurance ride; I'll hit the Wednesday ride and mix it up a bit, but will keep HR below 85% max.
Thursday: 2hr lunch or afternoon ride with a bit of intensity
Friday: hour easy spin
Saturday: 4hrs climbing endurance; Swami's ride in east county
Sunday: 3-4hrs chill ride up the coast
 
I'm giving this schedule a try over the next two weeks just to see if it needs to be modified or not.  Today was my first Wednesday ride; 4hrs almost to the second and 75 miles.  Most of it was solo into a slight but steady cross wind.  Coming back I was lucky to work with a 6 person group but almost went down when someone didn't point out a major crack in the road.  I ruined my rim and got a slow flat but did not go down, which is always good.  Overall, I felt strong during the whole ride and rate is at a 7 out of 10.  The only pain I had was the slight saddle sore that's developing!!!
 
Kam
 
Kam Zardouzian
Senior Coach & Founder Raceplan Coaching & Racing
Kam@raceplan.com
www.raceplan.com
tel:
mobile:
858-414-2624
858-414-2624
Add me to your address book... Want a signature like this?
 

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.9/42 - Release Date: 7/6/2005

Wednesday, July 06, 2005

New Training

It's the beginning of July and my season is over!
 
That's amazing to me because when I was in Colorado I'd just be peaking around this time.  Certainly my friends in the Rocky Mountains are all starting to race more.  But not for this newly planted SoCal Boy.  I'm all done!  The TT season picks back up in September so I'm taking a bit of a breather, especially after the RAAM, and then hitting the gym and building base miles.
 
I'm looking forward to a little surf trip my buddy Chris Miller has planned.  We'll be surfing the warm water of Sinaloa July 17-24th and I am really, really ready for it!
 
After that, I've built a pretty aggressive schedule to utilize the great strength that I've been able to keep through the season.  My base building schedule will call for 6 days of riding, two days in the gym and a power Yoga class per week.  I thought about incorporating some running and swimming into the mix, but after one run I realized I wasn't into it.  If it guaranteed that I would shed 10Lbs., I'd do it.  But I know I can accomplish this through riding and gym alone.
 
My schedule will look something like this:
Monday: Gym
Tuesday: 2hr lunch ride, a bit of intensity, followed by Yoga at night
Wednesday: 4-5hrs endurance ride; I'll hit the Wednesday ride and mix it up a bit, but will keep HR below 85% max.
Thursday: 2hr lunch or afternoon ride with a bit of intensity
Friday: hour easy spin
Saturday: 4hrs climbing endurance; Swami's ride in east county
Sunday: 3-4hrs chill ride up the coast
 
I'm giving this schedule a try over the next two weeks just to see if it needs to be modified or not.  Today was my first Wednesday ride; 4hrs almost to the second and 75 miles.  Most of it was solo into a slight but steady cross wind.  Coming back I was lucky to work with a 6 person group but almost went down when someone didn't point out a major crack in the road.  I ruined my rim and got a slow flat but did not go down, which is always good.  Overall, I felt strong during the whole ride and rate is at a 7 out of 10.  The only pain I had was the slight saddle sore that's developing!!!
 
Kam
 
Kam Zardouzian
Senior Coach & Founder Raceplan Coaching & Racing
Kam@raceplan.com
www.raceplan.com
tel:
mobile:
858-414-2624
858-414-2624
Add me to your address book... Want a signature like this?
 

Wednesday, June 01, 2005

Training plan

Today is recovery day from yesterday's hard effort, which was only 2hours of riding that covered 30miles and over 2,600 feet of climbing.
Once I get out, I'll do 2-3 hours of endurance riding.
 
Kam Zardouzian
Senior Coach & Founder Raceplan Coaching & Racing
Kam@raceplan.com
www.raceplan.com
tel:
mobile:
858-414-2624
858-414-2624
Add me to your address book... Want a signature like this?
 

18 days to RAAM...

and the mornings are starting to come around a lot quicker!

I'm fighting to find time to rest more...but it just doesn't happen. Got too much on my plate and not enough time or energy to complete everything. Time to put to practice the things I coach my athletes....balance is a myth, make conscious decisions on what is most important and give it your 100% attention, then move on.

With 18 days to the Race Across America send off, we're still one rider short since Raceboy hurt his back and decided to back out. I feel bad for him, because I know this is harder on him than on the team. But, we must push forward.

We had a great radio interview last Sunday night, May 29th, with Bob Babbitt and Pual Huddle at The Competitor Radio Show. Erika Barajas was with Alber, Erik and I and the balance between our messing around and her story proved to be a good balance. At the end, we achieved our goal of telling her story, getting the word out about what we're doing, and helping to promote our sponsors.

Okay, time to go pull up flooring in the kitchen, then a ride!

I'll sign off by yelling Raceboy's favorite saying; LONG LIVE ARMENIA!